Stroker Chevez still at it
- Thread starter highwayman
- Start date
spike
New Member
Where's there's possible election fraud paranioa is much better than naivete or willful ignorance.
highwayman
New Member
Now now, it's the people that voted the other guy thats in question. Fact of the matter is some people are sore losers...
chcr
Too cute for words
Clearly, anyone holding a conflicting opinion must, by definition, be guilty of either or both I guess. Luis, actually living there, couldn't possibly know anything at all about the circumstances surrounding the election now, could he?
spike
New Member
Clearly, anyone holding a conflicting opinion must, by definition, be guilty of either or both I guess. Luis, actually living there, couldn't possibly know anything at all about the circumstances surrounding the election now, could he?
No, anyone with a conflicting opinion is paranoid. Luis living there could make him less objective than people without a stake in the outcome.
Yeah, Fox is a genious, here's why:
- He managed to buy like 98% of the opinion polls for at least 4 months before the election so they would show Felipe Calderon as the leader.
- He managed to make a fraud on a country scale involving one million mexicans (of which hundreds of thousands were AMLO supporters), to make Felipe Calderon the winner.
- He managed to buy the international observators so they wouldn't report any anomaly in the process.
All this without a single lawsuit or report of an electoral crime. Of course, such reports were presented AFTER someone was informed that he lost the election. Geez, when I grow up I wish I can be as smart as our president.
- He managed to buy like 98% of the opinion polls for at least 4 months before the election so they would show Felipe Calderon as the leader.
- He managed to make a fraud on a country scale involving one million mexicans (of which hundreds of thousands were AMLO supporters), to make Felipe Calderon the winner.
- He managed to buy the international observators so they wouldn't report any anomaly in the process.
All this without a single lawsuit or report of an electoral crime. Of course, such reports were presented AFTER someone was informed that he lost the election. Geez, when I grow up I wish I can be as smart as our president.
chcr
Too cute for words
Anyone who doesn't agree with your opinion is paranoid?
highwayman
New Member
highwayman
New Member
chcr
Too cute for words
Clearly, anyone holding a conflicting opinion must, by definition, be guilty of either or both I guess. Luis, actually living there, couldn't possibly know anything at all about the circumstances surrounding the election now, could he?
I'll use shorter words from now on.
highwayman
New Member
Resorting to name calling now?
Amazing how when words run out the names start flying...
spike said:
The devient sexual behavier sugestions started with this comment, only a paranoid personality would let it go further then the original comment...
spike
New Member
Words running out? You called me paranoid and then posted smilies dropping their pants and giving the finger. Really think you have any room to talk here?
spike
New Member
Just read closer
there is some people that would call any anomalie a fraud
^Conflicting opinion is paranoid
^Comment ignoring the highwayman paranoid reference
^Comment pointing out the original paranoid comment by highwayman.
That clear now? The gist is you seem to have got the idea that anybody with a conflicting opinion to mine must be naive or willfully ignorant. Even though I didn't say that what I was pointing out is that my conflicting opnion was called paranoid first and you don't seem to have problem with that.
Nice reason to try out the multi-quote however.