Foreknowledge of A Natural Disaster
- Thread starter tank girl
- Start date
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
Let me back up a little. I see you are basing your views on the usual suspects.
Your sources; They all tend to be from zealots of the leftist agenda, the insane. There are many lies in the wisdoms ™ you so willingly swallow without chewing. Your souces keep kicking your sweet little butt.
I would love to show you things; you first must be willing to shed your impenetrable armor and let go your fears. You must be open minded to new things.
Your sources; They all tend to be from zealots of the leftist agenda, the insane. There are many lies in the wisdoms ™ you so willingly swallow without chewing. Your souces keep kicking your sweet little butt.
I would love to show you things; you first must be willing to shed your impenetrable armor and let go your fears. You must be open minded to new things.
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
tank girl said:blather....
And btw....I was already onto the H.A.A.R.P project before you even needed to mention it.
tricky....see I'm already one step ahead of you, m'dear
Oh dearest, you've said you didn't knoqw where this was going. When pressed you had ample oppertunity yet no soulution. ...suddenly you do.
I see we have much werk to do with you...
Oh and as for the US kicking all the garcia people out of their houses. I think your mistaken.
The 70-year agreement between the UK and US for the US to use the island as a military base was made in 1966. Between 1967 and 1973 the British Government forcibly removed 2,000 Ilois resident islanders to make way for the military base.
In 2000 the British High Court granted the islanders the right to return to the Archipelago. In 2002 the islanders and their descendants, now numbering 4,500, returned to court claiming compensation, after what they said were two years of delays by the British Foreign Office. However, in June, 2004 the British government invoked a royal decree, forever banning the islanders from returning home, reversing the 2000 court decision. The islanders currently live in Mauritius and the Seychelles. A few dozen are fighting to be housed in the UK[2] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/southern_counties/3977853.stm).
No where in this or anywhere does it say the US did this. The UK did it my dear. please read all all of what you want to use as propaganda before putting foot in mouth.
The 70-year agreement between the UK and US for the US to use the island as a military base was made in 1966. Between 1967 and 1973 the British Government forcibly removed 2,000 Ilois resident islanders to make way for the military base.
In 2000 the British High Court granted the islanders the right to return to the Archipelago. In 2002 the islanders and their descendants, now numbering 4,500, returned to court claiming compensation, after what they said were two years of delays by the British Foreign Office. However, in June, 2004 the British government invoked a royal decree, forever banning the islanders from returning home, reversing the 2000 court decision. The islanders currently live in Mauritius and the Seychelles. A few dozen are fighting to be housed in the UK[2] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/southern_counties/3977853.stm).
No where in this or anywhere does it say the US did this. The UK did it my dear. please read all all of what you want to use as propaganda before putting foot in mouth.
tank girl
New Member
samcurry said:
Ah thank you for your enlightened views, and yes I did read that. It is information that is entirely accurate - There is a definate relationship between the Brittish action of removing the residents of the island in the first instance and the U.S government, and both had an arrangement between them to undertake the occupation. I've acually had the pleasure to have watched a very significant and credible documentuary about that fact, so yes, I do know what I am talking about - and I read every word that there was there - thats entirely correct, but theres a bit more to it than that - not to mention a hell of a lot of secrecy.
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
tank girl said:
Phenomenological perception is usually quite misleading to ones self. The self proclamation of such philosophical and intellectual stature does not render it unto truth.
However I am glad to see that your Superego is intact.
unclehobart
New Member
There are always solutions... but the results may not be all that most can stomach as the methods are extramoral.
unclehobart
New Member
*passes a bong*
This may be a long night indeed ... or day... depending upon the time zone.
*takes another hit in contemplation of the 24 hour time/space speed smear*
This may be a long night indeed ... or day... depending upon the time zone.
*takes another hit in contemplation of the 24 hour time/space speed smear*
unclehobart
New Member
I'm starting to feel that her whole persona is BS and that shes feeling us out as a possible advanced degree studies in group dimentia and riling us accordingly. If you want an advanced case study, look no further. Any one of us would satisfy.
