While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks away".

JTP

New Member
Re: Golly gee Sgt Carter, why would Osama want to fight Moosies?

When did a sitting President side with the enemy?

Don't make me cut and paste that picture of Dubya holding hands with the Clown Prince. :finger:
 

MrBishop

Well-Known Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

When it is the State of Islam.

Wrong answer..but thanks for playing.

Radicals, who currently use the Koran as a weapon would be using anything else as their flag to rally around if the Koran wasn't available to them. It might be racial differences, geography, or even sex. There are as many who use the Bible as a weapon, but we're not likely to begin carpet-bombing the Vatican any day now.
 

ResearchMonkey

Well-Known Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

An Islamic State is the goal of the radicals, a religious state. That is the enemy and Islamic moderates need to speak out against the Islamic State.
 

catocom

Well-Known Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

Sharia law or bust?
 

spike

New Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

An Islamic State is the goal of the radicals, a religious state. That is the enemy and Islamic moderates need to speak out against the Islamic State.

Islmaic states are actually not our enemy. I don't think you know who are enemies are. I understand you'd like to have a religious war but it's not real.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

Radicals, who currently use the Koran as a weapon would be using anything else as their flag to rally around if the Koran wasn't available to them.

Very true. However, that's not what they're using. They are using the Muslim faith as an excuse. There has been very little Muslim backlash. Ironically, it took an United States Army Major killing 13 people for a loud enough murmur to be heard condemning his action. A start or safe since it was an American killing Americans?

There are as many who use the Bible as a weapon, but we're not likely to begin carpet-bombing the Vatican any day now.

I'll make you a deal. If Christians terrorize other groups, claim them to be doing their evil in the name of Chrsitianity & the outcry is not ten times louder than the blast, then, bomb away.
 

spike

New Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

There has been very little Muslim backlash.

That's a straight up lie and you know it. Muslim leaders denouncing radical has been very common and discussed with you before.

I'll make you a deal. If Christians terrorize other groups, claim them to be doing their evil in the name of Chrsitianity & the outcry is not ten times louder than the blast, then, bomb away.

Yeah, I didn't hear much christian outcry against the abortion doc killer. In fact he got a lot of encouragement from christians afterwards.

Time to bomb them.
 

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

SOURCE

White House aides: No Afghan decision before Thanksgiving

By Anne E. Kornblut
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:50 PM

SEOUL -- President Obama will not announce his decision on sending more troops to Afghanistan before the Thanksgiving holiday, senior aides said Thursday.

The news came as the president greeted 1,500 troops at Osan Air Base in South Korea, just before boarding Air Force One and heading back to Washington after an eight-day trip to Asia.

Obama and his top military and diplomatic aides have been deliberating for months over how to proceed in Afghanistan, where the United States and its partners have sought for eight years to defeat the Taliban and deny al-Qaeda a safe haven from which it can plan and launch attacks.

Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, has stated that without the deployment of up to 40,000 additional troops within the next year, the mission "will likely result in failure." But some aides are arguing for a much smaller troop increase, and the U.S. ambassador in Kabul, Karl W. Eikenberry, has questioned whether the Afghan government can be a reliable partner.

Obama said in interviews Wednesday that he would reveal his decision within the next several weeks. On Thursday, aides clarified that there would be no announcement before Thanksgiving, one week away. Senior administration officials said Obama intends to meet with his national security team again before going public with his plans.

Obama did not mention the looming decision in his remarks to U.S. troops, referring to the Afghan conflict only by thanking South Korea for its efforts and expressing gratitude to the American military personnel who have served there.

But he did discuss the region in his meeting with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, whose government is sending 150 civilian aid workers to Afghanistan.

Obama arrived on the base 3:19 p.m. local time (1 a.m. Eastern Standard Time) and received a rousing welcome from 1,500 troops in camouflage uniforms, many holding cameras or pointing cellphones to snap pictures.

"You guys make a pretty good photo op," the president said.

Standing on a riser wearing a blue suit and red tie, with a cluster of troops and a large American flag behind him, Obama expressed "the gratitude of the American public" and said his meetings in four countries over eight days in Asia will help deliver a "safer, more prosperous world for all of us."

He got a huge cheer when he told them he was increasing military pay. "That's what you call an applause line," he said, before boarding his jet and taking off at 4:11 p.m.
 

spike

New Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

Uh oh. Not Thanksgiving.
 

catocom

Well-Known Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

seems the decision is ....nothing.
just let um sit there, and get picked off.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

Good. That way only a few more troops will be blown to bits & He won't have to worry his pretty little mind over the holiday. Whew - what a relief.
 

Winky

Well-Known Member
Obammie keeps on killing American troops daily.

I know it puts my mind at ease.
Besides it will allow him more time to
continue to plot the downfall of our country instead.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

Absolutely.
After all, the Founding Fathers didn't arrange a way to re-distribute the wealth
 

spike

New Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

Absolutely.
After all, the Founding Fathers didn't arrange a way to re-distribute the wealth

They didn't arrange a way to bring other countries "out of the second century".
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

You're correct. They did, however, give any sitting Congress that authority.
 

spike

New Member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

No, bringing countries out of the second century is not enumerated.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Re: While American troops dead or wounded daily, Obama's decision on troops "weeks aw

Sure it is. Several times. Do I need to show you, again?
 
Top