Squiggy
ThunderDick
Gonz said:We will turn Iraq into a democractic country or they'll die trying.

Gonz said:We will turn Iraq into a democractic country or they'll die trying.
Gonz said:So, from now on, a country that goes to war is supposed to give a timetable, like "THe Czech Republic will now invade & conquer Norway" We will do it in 450 days." That would be ludicrous. It gives the enemy a date to survive until and that is not how war works. We will turn Iraq into a democractic country or they'll die trying.![]()
Gonz said:We will turn Iraq into a democractic country or they'll die trying.![]()
rr said:What are they in this war?
For a country that's intending to conquer and pillage another, there's no reason to fix a time limit. Though, by the "we're going to save them and help them" bullshit you keep repeating I thought it was not the case.Gonz said:So, from now on, a country that goes to war is supposed to give a timetable, like "THe Czech Republic will now invade & conquer Norway" We will do it in 450 days." That would be ludicrous. It gives the enemy a date to survive until and that is not how war works.
Then as I feared, you're going to get another 80's Afghanistan in you lap...We will turn Iraq into a democractic country or they'll die trying.![]()
Squiggy said:I could have sworn we "liberated" them...not conquered them...at least thats what I was told....Oh yeah. That was Bush what said that. Guess its just another lie.
Squiggy said:I could have sworn we "liberated" them...not conquered them...at least thats what I was told....Oh yeah. That was Bush what said that. Guess its just another lie.
rrfield said:Timetables aren't what's needed...a clear exit stragety and definition of victory are. That's what we had in Gulf War I, once Iraq was out of Kuwait, victory was ours and we were done. Exit stragety. Clear definition of victory. What are they in this war?
rrfield
We conquered the government in order to liberate the people.
We will turn Iraq into a democractic country or they'll die trying.
Luis G said:OIL, they'll claim victory and pull back when there's no oil left in Iraq.
freako104 said:didnt they say there is no real connection between Sadam and teh Islamic terrorists?
Luis G said:OIL, they'll claim victory and pull back when there's no oil left in Iraq.
Kind of a provincial outlook, don't you think? Big oil companies are large, multinational corporations. The US gets something like one percent of their oil from Iraq. This in no way implies that the afforementioned large, multinational corporations aren't still interested. It was about oil, it's about oil now, it will continue to be about oil. I suppose that the fact that the Bushes (pun not intended) and everyone they know are major players in the international oil busisness is mere coincidence. The war on terror would be a convincing argument if they were in fact doing anything about terrorism.The Other One said:Sweet--I'm getting tired of paying $1.55 for premium... but maybe this will delay sucking Iraq dry?
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=509 : "Oil installations are far more dilapidated than thought, constant prey to organized sabotage and criminal looting. Oil wells and pumping stations have been repeatedly damaged at both the northern and southern oil fields – and not only by diehard pro-Saddam guerrillas. Local tribal interests seeking a stake in the oil industry are behind some of the gangs of saboteurs, and looters make off with replacement parts as soon as they are installed."
I'd love to see gas drop below .75 --wait, wait -- .50 a gallon--do you think it will happen very soon?
Luis G said:OIL, they'll claim victory and pull back when there's no oil left in Iraq.
Leslie said:yeah, but then it wouldn't have been quite so easy to bamboozle "we the people"...racism and hate seems to have been a handy tool there.
they'd have to send some muslim missionaries to do some work turning mexicans around first before they ever got support for that.